Artificial intelligence patent rejection

5 Ways Artificial Intelligence Can Be Utilized to Generate Better Responses to Patent Rejections

November 28, 20223 min read

In the world of patent law, artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used to generate better responses to patent examiner rejections than lawyers. AI-assisted patent prosecution is becoming more common as the technology continues to improve.

Here are five ways in which artificial intelligence can provide better replies to patent examiner denials than lawyers can.

1. An Examination of Vast Amounts of Inventive Material and Patent Information

To begin, AI is capable of quickly analyzing enormous volumes of data in order to detect patterns and trends in the denials made by patent examiners. Because of this, attorneys are able to immediately detect potential problems and devise tactics for responding to rejections. The use of AI can also provide useful insights on how to construct the most persuasive arguments in response to being rejected.

2. A Prior Art Search That Is Both More Accurate and More Comprehensive

Second, artificial intelligence can be used to produce prior art searches that are both more accurate and extensive. AI is able to scan through millions of patent documents in a short amount of time to locate the prior art that is most relevant, thereby assisting patent attorneys in developing the most compelling arguments in response to rejections.

3. Comprehensive Charts of All Claims

Thirdly, AI can be utilized to develop claim charts that are both more accurate and more thorough. Claim charts are utilized in the process of comparing the claims of a patent to the previous art in order to assist attorneys in the identification of potential problems with the claims. Artificial intelligence (AI) can swiftly develop claim charts that are more accurate and thorough than lawyers can, saving both time and effort.

4. Opinions Regarding Patentability

Fourth, artificial intelligence can be utilized to create patentability opinions that are more accurate and thorough. Opinions on patentability are utilized in the process of calculating the possibility that a patent will be approved. AI is capable of rapidly generating patentability opinions that are more accurate and thorough than those generated by lawyers, which helps to lower the likelihood of rejection.

5. Responses to Patent Rejections That Are Both More Accurate and More Comprehensive

Last but not least, AI can be utilized to provide answers to patent examiner rejections that are both more accurate and complete. AI is able to swiftly analyze the rejections and provide responses that are more accurate and thorough than those generated by lawyers, which helps to lessen the danger of rejections.

As the technology continues to advance, it is becoming increasingly customary to use AI to aid in the prosecution of patent applications. AI has the potential to develop replies to patent examiner rejections that are superior to those generated by lawyers, which will help to lower the chance of rejection and save time and effort.

Schell IP is a Denver patent law firm. Its mission is to leverage artificial intelligence in all aspects of the patenting process to create more valuable intellectual property assets.

If you would like to discuss a specific product concept requiring patent protection or speak with a patent lawyer, feel free to contact the Schell IP team.

patent rejectionpatent prosecutionpatent lawyeraiartificial intelligence
blog author image

Jeffrey Schell

Jeff’s mission is to transform innovative concepts into extraordinary companies. In 2019, top tier law firm Hall Estill acquired the rights to the Rocky Mountain Patent brand, where he became the director of its national Ventures Growth practice. Following his departure from Hall Estill, he founded Schell IP specifically to incorporate all aspects of artificial intelligence in a new model for an intellectual property law practice. Jeff attended Northwestern University, graduating with degrees in Industrial Engineering & Management Sciences and Economics in 2004. He subsequently earned his JD and masters degrees in International Studies and Medical Informatics. Jeff separately studied economics at Harvard University, and in 2007, was a delegate at the Harvard China-India Development & Relations Symposium. ColoradoBiz Magazine named Jeff one of the 25 "Most Influential Young Professionals in Colorado.” He was also a finalist for the Denver Post's "Colorado Innovator of the Year" and "Denver Trailblazer" awards. In 2017, Denver Mayor Michael Hancock invited Jeff to participate in Denver's official trade delegation to South Africa and Kenya. He also became elected President of TiE Denver, one of Colorado’s leading entrepreneur and angel investor ecosystems, from 2019-2020.

Back to Blog

If you would like to discuss a specific product concept requiring patent protection or speak with a patent lawyer, feel free to contact the Schell IP team.

The content of this website is not intended as legal advice. If you have any question pertaining to a specific matter, speak with an attorney.